A very loose circumcision, one might almost think this penis is intact.

 PHOTO #1

A typical looking circumcision. (This is a photo of a famous
contemporary  singer/rapper btw) :)

PHOTO #2

This is a common-looking flaccid uncircumcised penis. Notice that the tip is NOT tight, and in fact the end of the foreskin is quite loose.  This is NOT uncommon, and restored foreskins appear almost indistinguishable to this upon completion to thie level.  The subject here in the full photo is in bed, laying horizontally.  

PHOTO #3
 

Uncircumcised penis, erect.  The frenelum is not clearly apparent here due to the amount of skin bunched around the sulcus of the glans.

PHOTO #4

Circumcised penis, erect.  This circumcision appears tight enough to cause some minor downward bending. Some frenar remnants are visible, but so is some significant scrotal skin that migrated upwards.

PHOTO #5

Circumcised penis, erect.  Notice the difference in the texture and color of the glans to Photo #5, even tho the models are of similar age and skin complexion?  IN FACT, this circumcised penis has a glans that is more smooth and shiny than the uncircumcised penis in Photo number 4!

PHOTO #6
 

Uncircumcised penis, erect. This man either has a tight frenelum not allowing the foreskin much movement (as it appears to be in this photo) or the man simply has an abundance of foreskin - with a glossy glans appearance.

PHOTO #7

Circumcised penis, erect.  Notice again the variation in color and visible texture of the glans.  This man was pretty much "cut clean" of any frenar remnants, and appears quite tightly circumcised.  Notice that the size of the glans of a circumcised man is invariably larger, more flared, than an uncircumcised penis' glans.

PHOTO #8

Uncircumcised penis, flaccid.
Notive not every intact penis has ultra-thin skin which many restorers think is normal.  There is no "norm" when it comes to uncircumcised/foreskin penis appearance.

PHOTO #9
 

Uncircumcised penis, erect.

PHOTO #10
 

This man has a very loose foreskin.  He has appeared in numerous gay porn films.  Even fully flaccid, his glans is always visible - and note that his glans is more 'matt' than even many circumcised mens' glans while flaccid.

PHOTO #11

This model has also appeared in many gay porn films with the model in Photo #11.  His skin is slightly tighter, but again his glans always remains partially visible.

PHOTO #12

This is a photo of the same penis seen in
Photo #10.  He has an abundance of foreskin, but always seems to draw-back on its own accord when he becomes erect.

PHOTO #13
 

Any restorers worried about their wrinkles? Well, this model is seen here flaccid - his skin as tightly drawn-up and closed as I have seen in any film or photos of him.  Notice that scrotal-skin/pubic-skin migration ALSO happens just naturally among intact penises as well as circumcised.

PHOTO #14
 

"Cleanly" circumcised penis in a semi-erect state. All traces of frenar remnants were sadly "cleaned off" by this model's circumciser.  From personal experience, this tends to be the "average" type of crcumcision you might come across in North America.

PHOTO #15

Another very clean-cut circumcision. I've not seen this model in videos, however it seems to me that this is a relatively tight circ not leaving much room to move skin around for pleasure for function.

PHOTO #16

II've not seen many circs that are tighter than this one. It (the skin) seems so strained to accommodate the model's erection that it does NOT look comfortable.  Despite this, look at this man's glans.  Again it is still more colorful and glossy than even Photos #11 and #4.

PHOTO #17  

Altho a small photo, you can easily see that this man's foreskin is extremely long even while he's semi-flaccid.  I expect this is a C-10+ level of foreskin coverage.

PHOTO #18

This man's circumcision, from the top anyway, looks as nicely done as a circumcision can be.  It is very dificult to even distinguish a scar - but it appears his circumcision is tight, in that the inner skin appears to be virtually gone.

PHOTO #19

Same penis as in Photo #15. Circumcised and fully erect. Lacking any frenular remnants.  Scar is moderately visible - and appears to be a nice clean circumfrential line.  I believe this is what is considered to be the best possible circumcision by medical professionals.  Clean.  Even-cut. Not particularly dark skin scarring from the circumcision.  Strange to think this is considered to be a circumcision procedure that was performed by the book - and thus - 'perfect'

PHOTO #20

Same uncircumcised penis as seen in Photo #7.

PHOTO #21