Foreskin Restoration Chat Info

TRANSCRIPT OF NOVEMBER 26th FRC CHAT
WITH DR.PETER BALL, NORM-UK Vice-Chair

(http://foreskinrestorationchat.info/chatroom.html)
(only public channel log is presented below, and all identifying IP addresses
and HostMasks which may be able to identify a user, has been deleted from this public log)


[11:49] * peter_ball_010 has joined #restorechat

[11:57] * Kitambi  has joined #restorechat

[12:00] * lk_jensen  has joined #restorechat

[12:01] * SharakoLunarWol1  has joined #restorechat

[12:02] * Jayskin  has joined #restorechat

[12:03] * lk_jensen  has left #restorechat

[12:03] <SharakoLunarWol1> morning everyone

[12:03] <Jayskin> morning all

[12:04] <Kitambi> 'lo

[12:04] * nf  has joined #restorechat

[12:05] <Kitambi> eh, I tried :p

[12:06] <nf> Hi

[12:06] <peter_ball_010> Just checking that i am with you all

[12:06] <Jayskin> seems ok here

[12:07] <SharakoLunarWol1> so how is everyone doing?

[12:07] <sozy1> HI all

[12:09] <peter_ball_010> Has anyone here reached thie desired goal ?

[12:09] <Kitambi> not even close

[12:09] <nf> Not me - just 2 months into it.

[12:09] <SharakoLunarWol1> no i have ben at it for 6 mounths now i am using a dtr. i am a ci3 still i was a ci2-3

[12:09] <Jayskin> been restoring for a few months........ getting bunched skin at the corona now

[12:10] <Kitambi> I've got these big fat wrinkles behind the corona, which frustrate me by not spilling over

[12:11] <peter_ball_010> Those wrinkles will in time

[12:11] <nf> Hopefully soon they will.

[12:11] <Kitambi> indeed

[12:12] <Jayskin> I guess patience is the key word

[12:12] <peter_ball_010> have you all read Jim Bigelow's Bood the 'joy of uncircumcising ?/

[12:12] <nf> I have glanced through it.

[12:12] <SharakoLunarWol1> i am curently reading it i am on ch 12 or 13

[12:13] <Jayskin> not yet

[12:13] <Kitambi> I have read it, yes

[12:13] <Jayskin> recommended reading?

[12:13] <Kitambi> I'd recommend it, yes

[12:14] <SharakoLunarWol1> its realy a amazing book if you can deal with all the down parts i have ben reading it sence aug

[12:14] <peter_ball_010> I think the more youknow about the subject the better you do

[12:14] <peter_ball_010> the down parts make gruesome reading

[12:14] <Jayskin> down parts?

[12:14] <peter_ball_010> Mens voices in the side of the pages

[12:16] <Kitambi> the book is available for purchase and download at http://www.norm.org/joy.html

[12:16] <Kitambi> it's $10, and you likely can't find it at the library

[12:16] <peter_ball_010> my library wouldnt stock it but agreed to accept it as agift from me!

[12:17] <SharakoLunarWol1> yeah i carry my book to and from school i cant put it down i have had so much inturest i may sugest it as reading materal at the comunity college i go to

[12:17] <Kitambi> yes, my library's website asked me if I meant "joy of encompassing"

[12:17] <peter_ball_010> then they hid it on a top shelf besides books on Native Funeral customs

[12:17] <SharakoLunarWol1> i actualy got one at my local libery through a book loan from calli

[12:18] <anteater> Is there an agenda for this chat, or is it open to questions?

[12:18] <peter_ball_010> luxky you

[12:18] <peter_ball_010> Open to questions i have been  told

[12:18] <SharakoLunarWol1> so what kind of dr are you?

[12:19] <nf> Peter - now that there is more of an understanding of the anatomy of the intact penis - how long before the medical profession in North America catches on that circimision is wrong?

[12:19] <anteater> Cool.  I'm interested in surgery to tighten the foreskin after finishing.  I saw a comment on NORM-UK's website that said the results are often too tight or too loose -- can you speak more about this?  How many men do you know that have done this?  What techniques were used? Etc.

[12:19] <peter_ball_010> Once they can find a differnet way of making money ?

[12:20] <nf> That's probably true as pathetic as it may be.

[12:20] <peter_ball_010> I only heard one man speak of his experience and he had to have 3 goes at getting it right

[12:21] <peter_ball_010> One cut is enough for most of us

[12:21] <Kitambi> I heard that the tip will usually tighten up on its own

[12:21] <peter_ball_010> there are muscle fibres in the scrotum and the shaft skin that help to close the tip

[12:21] <anteater> Hmmm.  You've completed your restoration, correct?  How well does your foreskin stay closed over your glans?

[12:22] <nf> I have read in the FRC forum that the new fs thins out and tightens up over a couple of years after your finished.

[12:22] <peter_ball_010> Perfect unless it is a vert hot day and i am nude on a beach

[12:23] <peter_ball_010> nf   that is very interesting

[12:23] <Jayskin> would you recommend restoration 24/7 or cycling?

[12:24] <peter_ball_010> I think cyvling is more realistic - as yet no convincing proof that 24/7 is best

[12:24] * anteater Quit (Quit: anteater)

[12:24] <Jayskin> that's what I have been doing with fairly good results so far

[12:25] <nf> I find it impossible to do it at night anyway (at least in these early stages)

[12:25] <peter_ball_010> nj/ What method are u using

[12:25] <SharakoLunarWol1> same here i tug in the wakeing ours and cover in the sleeping its just slow going

[12:26] <Jayskin> I have been trying at night but with constant erections it tends to hurt

[12:26] <nf> Three - TLC tugger, manual tugging and just started trying dtr device

[12:27] <Jayskin> TLC tugger and manual here........ thinking of ordering dtr as well for more inner growth

[12:27] <nf> I only tried tlc tugger at night.  Now I just retain with skin cone at night - it comes off too.

[12:27] <peter_ball_010> the TLC tugger with taping up toward the shoulder should be ol at night

[12:28] <peter_ball_010> ol=ok

[12:28] <SharakoLunarWol1> i use a man hood at night my self it keeps it forword but the problem i have frequantly is  there is velcrow at the base and it fits my fnacid cercumfrance but not my erect

[12:28] <Jayskin> that's what I have tried but the skin pulls too much when erect

***** Carrying Out Hourly Online Check...... (190)  The Backup Is Up To Date.

[12:29] <SharakoLunarWol1> its snowing here 0.0

[12:29] <peter_ball_010> tuga hoy and TLC both are quite good with erections as long as the penis can pont upwards

[12:29] <nf> I didn't tape but used the straps and also with no tugging - erections just pop it off.  I think that it is probably because I don't have enough skin yet.

[12:30] <peter_ball_010> could be true

[12:30] <Kitambi> the cone will stay on when you get more skin

[12:30] <Kitambi> mine stayed on all last night

[12:31] <Kitambi> and only rarely falls off, really

[12:31] <SharakoLunarWol1> i have tryed o rings but not enough skin yet

[12:31] <nf> Peter - what do you think of the plunger type of devices like the dtr and Cat II - they do seem to concentrate tension on inner skin?

[12:32] <peter_ball_010> True. I thinkthey do a good job but personally i found them uncomfortable

[12:33] <Jayskin> maybe that's my problem as well - not enough skin yet

[12:33] <peter_ball_010> the old fasioned pill tube and tape is good for starters

[12:34] <Jayskin> I just find urination in public such a hassel with taped methods

[12:34] <peter_ball_010> The pill tube is great you can pee down the middle

[12:36] <Jayskin> can you leave the tube attached for a few days?

[12:36] <nf> I find the tlc tugger eventually slips off even in the day - not enough skin.  However, the dtr seems to stay on.  The hols in the gripper help - but they also can cause some discomfort.  I just reduce tension and take short breaks and it seems ok.

[12:37] <nf> Peter - what do you think of the theories that tugging in combination with heat can accelerate results.

[12:37] <peter_ball_010> Jayskin   Better to take it off once a day for a a wash and let the skin recover

[12:38] <Jayskin> that's what i thought

[12:38] <peter_ball_010> Those that have tried are very convinced that it helps

[12:38] <peter_ball_010> I think it may be good

[12:40] <nf> When I manual tug I do it while taking a hot bath - too early to tell if it helps but it seems that the skin is more supple and stretches easy - appears to be good.

[12:40] <Jayskin> what ci would you say you are? and how long did you restore?

[12:40] <peter_ball_010> sorry I have forgotten the definitions c

[12:41] <nf> c1 to c10  c1 is tightly cut and c10 is intact with complete coverage with erection

[12:41] <Jayskin> do you have full glans coverage? and how long did it take?

[12:41] <peter_ball_010> Can I say that I have full coverage when erect but of course the skin will retract shortly after that =C10 i have just been told

[12:42] <Jayskin> that's impressive.......... I'm hoping for the same

[12:43] <peter_ball_010> It took me 18 months to get 2/3 coverage and 3 years for reliable full flaccid coverage

[12:43] <Kitambi> how loose were you when you started?

[12:43] <Jayskin> may I ask what method(s) you used?

[12:45] <peter_ball_010> Micropore tape initially, pill tubes,  EZ briefly, tugahoy and the most useful for me - the TLC tugger

[12:47] <SharakoLunarWol1> how do you deal with the ignorant people out there i find about 30 % of the people out there are igronent 45% are oppen and intrusted  and 15 % are nutral

[12:47] <peter_ball_010> I started late in life so

[12:48] <peter_ball_010> I was fairly loose but couldnt pull enough skin over the glans to masturbate

[12:48] <nf> That is pretty tight.

[12:49] <peter_ball_010> That became possible after about 2 months of restoration and gave me a fantastic orgasm

[12:49] <nf> I thought I was very tight but I could always force the skin over my glans.

[12:50] <peter_ball_010> How we differ

[12:50] <Jayskin> I thought I was tight as well but I could almost cover my glans completely with skin while masturbating..... it was tight but I could do it

[12:50] <nf> same here

[12:51] <peter_ball_010> then you should do very well restoring

[12:51] <Jayskin> after a few months of restoring now, it's much easier and feels much better especially if the head is moist

[12:52] <nf> slw - the ignorance is not the peoples fault - it is a problem with our current society.  I was also ignorant until not too long ago.  We need to learn to speak out more on this subject - but it is not easy.

[12:52] <Jayskin> I'm hoping I'll do well restoring........ I'm very excited about the final outcome

[12:52] <peter_ball_010> Persistance is the name of the game

[12:53] <Jayskin> yes, I'm realizing that

[12:53] <nf> I have noticed that by keeping covered and using vitame E lotion to keep the glans moist has made a dramatic improvement in sensitiviy and in orgasm intensity.

[12:54] <peter_ball_010> keeping the glans moist is defitinitely a good thing

[12:54] <nf> I can't wait until I just I don't have to do anything special - everything just natural.

[12:55] <peter_ball_010> Its a fantastic state believe me

[12:55] <Jayskin> me too........ can't wait to have a naturally moist glans

[12:56] <nf> Thanks - that is very motivating - the process is sooo slooow it is easy to get frustrated.  I need the goal to be reinforced.

[12:56] * masion  has joined #restorechat

[12:56] <masion> hi,<same one from NY, please

[12:56] <FRC-Protector2> Status: No Op's ( @ )

[12:57] <peter_ball_010> I hope all you tuggers are also doing your best to spread the word that circumcision is a bad thing

[12:57] * masion Quit (Quit: masion)

[12:57] <SharakoLunarWol1> i do i tell everyone i can i show them statistics in the joy book

[12:58] <nf> I agree we need to - but it is not an easy thing to discuss in public - good for you SLW

[12:58] <Jayskin> for sure.......... circumcision is a violation of your body

[12:58] <SharakoLunarWol1> but there are the igronent out there who beleave they have the right to mudalater there kids ... i get so angry

[12:58] <nf> It should be like in Sweden where it is illegal unless there is a medical need.

[12:59] <nf> Don't blame the parents - they don't know.

[12:59] <peter_ball_010> Alan Cuming has just become our Patron - he is intact and proud to tell people

[12:59] <Jayskin> I know I was told it was for cleanliness......... that's bs

[13:00] <SharakoLunarWol1> mine was done so i can be like daddy  but i couldent be more diffrent

[13:00] <nf> One thing that I wonder about is "informed consent".  The medical profession is not informing parents of the 100% guaranteed negative consequences of circimcision.  Not that this knowledge is available aren't they obligated to tell.

[13:01] <nf> Now this knowledge...

[13:01] <peter_ball_010> They should of course but not all medica believe it

[13:01] <peter_ball_010> A lot of medics are cirucmcised themselves

[13:02] <nf> Isn't "informed consent" a legal requirement?

[13:02] <peter_ball_010> Yes   But what needs to told is still abit woolly

[13:02] <SharakoLunarWol1> i have met doctors who think i am crazy for wanting to restore. i havent gon back to see them

[13:03] <nf> I guess the information isn't yet widespread - isn't there a mechanism to spread new information to doctors

[13:03] <Jayskin> I think most doctors in North America are like that

[13:03] <peter_ball_010> I gave my doctor a copy of a video i made about restoration  |he did nt comment

[13:04] <nf> Sounds like he wasn't interested.

[13:05] <SharakoLunarWol1> yeah i find the less money a dr makes the more they are willing to help. at least from my pbservation

[13:05] <peter_ball_010> He did agree to let me show him my restoration and seem ed quite interested

[13:05] * mel_senior has joined #restorechat

[13:05] <nf> That's a good sign.

[13:06] <peter_ball_010> I urge my restorers in the UK to tell their Doctors what there doing for info. They are a bit bashful

[13:07] <nf> I am bashful - I don't see my doctor very often - I think I'll wait until I am almost done before I go for my next physical - see if he notices.

[13:08] <SharakoLunarWol1> is your ferum more promanet after restoring. i allways have problems with that word

[13:08] <mel_senior> hello all....

[13:08] <SharakoLunarWol1> hello

[13:08] <peter_ball_010> You had better say something about it if only to get his reaction

[13:09] <nf> Okay

[13:09] <peter_ball_010> Your frenum or frenulum will remain as before unless you damage it

[13:09] <nf> can restoration damage it??

[13:10] <SharakoLunarWol1> well mine is visable when i am flacid but it is not visable when i am hard

[13:10] <nf> I don't want to mess up what little I have left.

[13:10] * Michael_the_choirboy has joined #restorechat

[13:10] <Jayskin> my frenulum is quite evident and sometimes it pulls a little when I'm restoring

[13:10] <peter_ball_010> Yes its possible to tear it - make sure there is a notch in devices to accommodate the frenulum

[13:11] <FRC-Protector2> Status: No Op's ( @ )

[13:11] <peter_ball_010> then it is unlikely to come to any harm

[13:11] <Jayskin> I'm using the TLC tugger with no frenulum notch......... I thought that was only for intact men

[13:11] <peter_ball_010> Jayskin-- be careful

[13:12] <SharakoLunarWol1> i have seen guys with big frenulum is there a way to make it mor promanent or that

[13:12] <peter_ball_010> You might be able to cut a groove in the cone

[13:12] <nf> My TLC doesn't have a notch either - but I think what is left of my frenulum is small enough it won't make a difference.

[13:13] <Jayskin> mine is actually quite tight around the frenulum

[13:13] <mel_senior> might i ask a different question?

[13:13] <nf> SLW - I think you are stuck with what you have (as we all are).

[13:13] <peter_ball_010> a big frenulum is Gods gif you cant improve on youve got

[13:13] <peter_ball_010> mel-  go ahead

[13:13] <SharakoLunarWol1> ok

[13:14] <mel_senior> hello, i wonder, is there any movement in any "circle" to conduct some REAL research in terms of what methods, etc... work?

[13:14] <peter_ball_010> Not that i am aware of

[13:14] <mel_senior> you are in UK, right?

[13:15] <nf> Mel - the device chart is a good start.

[13:15] <peter_ball_010> The difficulty is that research requires control-  men not restorina to compare etc

[13:15] <mel_senior> would UK or USA "granting agencies" be receptive to inquires about this?

[13:15] <peter_ball_010> Yes i am in the UK

[13:15] <mel_senior> yes, controls would be the "key"...

[13:16] <mel_senior> i mean, there is probably grant $ avail to look at impacts of breast reduction surgery....

[13:17] <nf> It would be very dificult - even one person with one device will not follow the same routine consistently.

[13:17] <peter_ball_010> the likelyhood of getting groups of men to use one method constistently to compare with another group using a different method is zilch

[13:17] <mel_senior> what recommendations would you give to "us" (as the voice of restoration) to push forward an agenda to get some grant money tossed at teh problem?

[13:18] <peter_ball_010> i think the research need to be into tissue expansion

[13:19] <nf> There is research in this are but not specifically for foreskin restoration.

[13:19] <mel_senior> humm.... i guess that is prob what is going on for breast reconstruct. surg.?

[13:19] <peter_ball_010> We already have discovered that the surgeons that use tissue expansion devices dont look further than the instruction book

[13:19] <nf> I think for general issues - burn victims, accident victims etc.

[13:20] <nf> That is not good.

[13:20] <peter_ball_010> If we knew more about tissue expansion and growth we could easily apply to our needs

[13:21] <nf> I did see an article on tissue expansion and use of heat to accelerate the process  (as mentioned earlier)

[13:21] <mel_senior> indeed, i guess using the ideas developed for other applications could help us move forward in the proper direction

[13:21] <peter_ball_010> there could a future in collecting data from everones restoration diaries

[13:22] <mel_senior> yes, i was thinking the same thing (collecting data sets)

[13:22] <mel_senior> i do not want to sound "selfegrandizing" (spelling), but i recently sat down (a LONG SIT!) and complied ~6 years of data on my own restorating

[13:23] <mel_senior> it was a very LARGE undertaking (if you are interested, i could get you a PDF of the report)

[13:23] <nf> 6 years - I hope you are finished.

[13:23] <peter_ball_010> A less mentioned reason for not cirucmcisng some-one is that his foreskin might be needed for grafting on his body after an accident

[13:24] <sozy1> Colecting data sets, while not as powerful a method as controlled experimentation, should over time provide useful info

[13:24] <mel_senior> re: 6 years = done?  i gained enough skin in ~2 years to keep me happy, but i'm still trying (on and off) for erect coverage... my own Holy Grail:

[13:24] <peter_ball_010> mel senior=  How mant pages o pdf woul that entail >

[13:24] <nf> If I had a foreskin a would rather they take the skin from somewhere else - thank you very much.

[13:25] <peter_ball_010> If you lost your eyelid you wouldnt say that

[13:25] <mel_senior> in total, it is ~8 pages of text (written like a scientific research paper) + 2 pages (1 table, 1 figure)

[13:26] <peter_ball_010> I would like to read it  peter@pjb.eclips.co.uk

[13:26] <mel_senior> i'll send it along.... if for some reason you do not get the e-mail, the PDF is also listed on the FRC site (thanks to STEVE!)

[13:27] <peter_ball_010> than ks

[13:28] <peter_ball_010> I have to leave you guys shortly my supper is getting cold Any last questions

[13:28] <nf> Thanks Peter - it was an interesting chat.

[13:29] <mel_senior> pdf is the "cyber mail"!

[13:29] <mel_senior> thanks for your time and guidance

[13:29] <peter_ball_010> I enjoyed chatting to all of you.  Good luck and carry on tugging

[13:29] <nf> PS  I probably would choose the eyelid.

***** Carrying Out Hourly Online Check...... (191)

[13:29] * peter_ball_010 Quit (Quit: peter_ball_010)

RETURN TO MAIN FRC WEBPAGE
RETURN TO MAIN FRC FORUMS